Case 2401739/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Wilson v Mr Richard Hesketh — 2022
- Case reference
- 2401739/2022
- Decision date
- 20 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Slater Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Wilson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr P Wilson presented a claim against Mr Richard Hesketh issued on 7 March 2022. The Employment Judge determined the matter under rule 21 because the respondent had failed to present a valid response on time.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages. It ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £3,700, with any appropriate deductions for tax and national insurance to be accounted for to HMRC.
The judgment also records that the claim succeeds and that the remedy to which the claimant was entitled would be determined at a Remedy Hearing, but the hearing listed for 13 June 2022 was cancelled. No discrimination, dismissal, or other substantive issues were recorded in the judgment text provided.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment: the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The judgment orders payment of the gross sum of £3,700, subject to the usual deductions for tax and national insurance if applicable. Paragraph 4 also states that the remedy would be determined at a Remedy Hearing, but the hearing listed for 13 June 2022 was cancelled. | Upheld | — | £3,700 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,700
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.