Case 2401741/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Z Carter v Shield Safety Group Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2401741/2022
- Decision date
- 27 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Horne
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Z Carter
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis judgment dealt only with part of Miss Z Carter's claim for damages for breach of contract. The tribunal said the affected part comprised the 18 allegations in the document headed 'Particularising Claims' and the table headed 'Failure of Process'. That part of the claim was struck out under Rule 37 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure.
The tribunal recorded that a case management order had been sent on 27 September 2022 and that the case management summary identified the alleged breaches of contract and the difficulty the claimant would face in showing that they caused recoverable loss. The claimant was given a strike-out warning and an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing, but on 8 October 2022 she emailed the tribunal saying that she would not be making representations to prevent this part of the claim being struck out.
The tribunal said the part of the claim therefore appeared not to be actively pursued. In any event, the claimant had not put forward any representation that it had a reasonable prospect of success, so that part of the claim was struck out. The judgment states that this does not affect the claimant's ability to pursue the remainder of her claim.
The tribunal also recorded that the claimant could still rely on the matters complained of as evidence of how the incident affected her in relation to the discrimination claim, and that the judgment would not affect the tribunal's assessment at the final hearing of what evidence is relevant. It also stated that the judgment did not affect the dates of any hearings.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | This was the part of the claimant's damages for breach of contract based on the 18 allegations in 'Particularising Claims' and the table headed 'Failure of Process'. The judgment struck out only that part of the claim; the remainder was left unaffected. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 37 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.