Case 2401745/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs. Lindsay Noelle Morris v Liberty Speciality Steels Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2401745/2021
- Decision date
- 25 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wheat REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs. Lindsay Noelle Morris
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs. Lindsay Noelle Morris brought a breach of contract claim against Liberty Speciality Steels Ltd. The case was heard remotely in Manchester before Employment Judge Wheat on 18 May 2021, with the claimant unrepresented and the respondent represented by Mr R Grove, solicitor.
The tribunal's judgment was limited to a single finding: the claimant's breach of contract claim was not well founded. It was therefore dismissed. The written record states that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
No monetary award was made, and the judgment does not record any separate remedy calculation, legal test, or additional substantive findings beyond the dismissal of the claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal stated that the claimant's breach of contract claim was not well founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.