Case 2401761/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Cooke v Manone Medical Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2401761/2019
- Decision date
- 9 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T.V. Ryan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Cooke
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the claimant's claims were dismissed for breach of an Order and a failure to pursue the claims actively. By a letter dated 24 July 2019, sent to the parties on 9 August 2019, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the claim and stated that no further hearing would take place. No merits findings or compensation were recorded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | Judgment states the claims were dismissed for breach of an Order and failure to pursue them actively; reasons state the claim was struck out after no sufficient representations or hearing request were made. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Judgment states the claims were dismissed for breach of an Order and failure to pursue them actively; reasons state the claim was struck out after no sufficient representations or hearing request were made. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.