Case 2401762/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Reynolds v My CSP — 2021
- Case reference
- 2401762/2020
- Decision date
- 15 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Grundy REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Reynolds
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe hearing on 5 March 2021 was a preliminary issue hearing on whether Mr Reynolds was a disabled person within section 6 of the Equality Act 2010 during the material period from July 2019 to December 2019. The tribunal accepted that he had a physical impairment affecting his right toe, with advanced osteoarthritis confirmed by the medical records and X-ray evidence, and a mental impairment in the form of anxiety and depression. It accepted his evidence that the toe pain was debilitating, disturbed sleep, caused fatigue, and affected sport and socialising, and that his mental health symptoms included low mood, panic attacks, poor sleep, tearfulness, nausea and chest pain.
The tribunal rejected the respondent's suggestion that his symptoms were exaggerated. Applying the statutory disability definition and the authorities it cited, including the 'more than minor or trivial' threshold and the long-term requirement in Schedule 1, it found that each impairment had a substantial adverse effect on day-to-day activities, that both had lasted more than 12 months, and that the depression in particular might recur. It therefore held that Mr Reynolds was disabled at the material time and said the disability claims could proceed to the final hearing listed for August 2021. No substantive liability or remedy was determined in this decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary disability-status issue only under section 6 Equality Act 2010. The tribunal found the claimant was a disabled person between July 2019 and December 2019, but did not decide substantive liability on the underlying discrimination claims. | Upheld | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
8 references- s.6 Equality Act 2010
- section 212 Equality Act 2010
- Schedule 1 paragraph 2 Equality Act 2010
- Schedule 1 paragraph 5 Equality Act 2010
- SCA Packaging Limited v Boyle
- Patel v Metropolitan Borough Council
- Nissa v Waverly Education Foundation Limited
- Leonard v Southern Derbyshire Chamber of Commerce
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.