Case 2401786/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Sherwood v Tradeforce Group — 2020
- Case reference
- 2401786/2020
- Decision date
- 12 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Parkin Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Sherwood
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment. The respondent did not present a response, and the tribunal determined the claim on the information before it. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages and ordered payment of £436.78 gross.
The tribunal also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £311.98 in damages. The judgment states that those damages were assessed on the basis of the claimant’s gross pay for the notice period, and notes that HMRC is likely to require tax and national insurance to be paid on that amount as Post-Employment Notice Pay once it is paid.
In addition, the tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £51.97. The listed hearing on 29 May 2020 was cancelled. The combined award on the face of the judgment was £800.73, with a separate notice explaining that interest may accrue if sums remain unpaid after the relevant decision day.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered the respondent to pay the gross sum of £436.78. | Upheld | — | £437 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £311.98, assessed on the basis of gross pay for the notice period. | Upheld | — | £312 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £51.97. | Upheld | — | £52 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £801
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.