Case 2401790/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A McKenna v Renewable Solutions Team Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2401790/2019
- Decision date
- 20 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ainscough
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A McKenna
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting alone, upheld Mr A McKenna’s claim for unlawful deduction from wages under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. It found that he was entitled to receive pay in accordance with the employment contract for the period from 29 May 2018 to 21 December 2018.
The tribunal ordered Renewable Solutions Team Ltd to pay the gross sum of £2,676.92 unlawfully deducted from the Claimant’s pay. That sum was made up of £1,436.92 in unpaid salary and £1,240 in unpaid bonus.
No other claim was recorded in the judgment, and no separate interest figure or other remedy amount was set out in the decision itself.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held that the Claimant was entitled to be paid in accordance with the employment contract between 29 May 2018 and 21 December 2018. The award comprised £1,436.92 in unpaid salary and £1,240 in unpaid bonus. | Upheld | — | £2,677 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,677
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.