Case 2401821/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Lindsey Whewell v Neil Cryer — 2026
- Case reference
- 2401821/2025
- Decision date
- 23 January 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shotter
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Lindsey Whewell
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 22 judgment issued after the respondent failed to enter a response. Employment Judge Shotter determined the claims on the papers and took the final hearing listed for 23 January 2026 out of the list.
The Tribunal upheld the claimant's holiday pay complaint, finding that the respondent had failed to pay her in accordance with regulations 14(2) and/or 16(1) of the Working Time Regulations 1998, and ordered the respondent to pay £247.50 gross (calculated on the basis of £990 gross per month, 16 hours a week at £15.47 per hour gross). The Tribunal also found the wrongful dismissal claim well-founded as a breach of contract and ordered the respondent to pay contractual notice pay of £247.50 gross, representing one week's statutory notice.
The claimant was made responsible for any tax or National Insurance on the sums awarded. A notice under Article 12 of the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 was issued, with the relevant decision day recorded as 13 February 2026 and interest accruing at the stipulated rate of 8% per annum if the sums were not paid in full within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Tribunal found the respondent failed to pay holiday pay in accordance with regulations 14(2) and/or 16(1) of the Working Time Regulations 1998. | Upheld | — | £248 |
| Wrongful dismissal | Breach of contract; respondent ordered to pay one week's statutory contractual notice pay. | Upheld | — | £248 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £495
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
5 references- regulation 14(2) Working Time Regulations 1998
- regulation 16(1) Working Time Regulations 1998
- Rule 22 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2025
- Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990, Article 12
- section 17 Judgments Act 1838
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.