Case 2401827/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs H Wilson v Alipharma Limited t/a Urmston Pharmacy — 2022
- Case reference
- 2401827/2020
- Decision date
- 4 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rice-Birchall REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs H Wilson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard remotely at Manchester on 29 and 30 March 2022 before Employment Judge Rice-Birchall. The claimant, Mrs H Wilson, brought claims against Alipharma Limited t/a Urmston Pharmacy. Her sex and disability discrimination claims were dismissed on withdrawal.
The tribunal upheld the claimant's unlawful deductions from wages claim in respect of statutory sick pay and ordered the respondent to pay £1,885. It also found a breach of contract because notice pay had not been paid, and awarded 12 weeks' pay in the sum of £2,304.60, subject to deductions.
The unfair dismissal claim succeeded. The tribunal awarded a basic award of £5,761.50 and made no compensatory award. It recorded that the recoupment provisions did not apply.
The tribunal also ordered payment of £350.45 net in respect of holiday pay which had accrued but remained unpaid. The judgment records the monetary awards in full and does not set out any additional remedy beyond those sums.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | The judgment refers to the claim as 'sex and/or disability discrimination' and states that it was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment refers to the claim as 'sex and/or disability discrimination' and states that it was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim succeeded in respect of statutory sick pay. | Upheld | — | £1,885 |
| Breach of contract | The respondent breached the contract by failing to pay notice; award was 12 weeks' pay subject to deductions. | Upheld | — | £2,305 |
| Unfair dismissal | The claim succeeded, but only a basic award was made; no compensatory award was awarded and the recoupment provisions did not apply. | Upheld | — | £5,762 |
| Holiday pay | Net sum owed for holiday pay which accrued but was unpaid. | Upheld | — | £350 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,302
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £5,762
- statutory, unfair dismissal
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.