Case 2401842/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr B Price v Channelwood Preservations Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2401842/2020
- Decision date
- 4 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shotter DATE
- Venue
- Liverpool
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr B Price
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Mr B Price, who was aged 59 at the effective date of termination on 31 August 2019, was dismissed by reason of redundancy. It held that he was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment calculated on the basis of 20 years at a gross weekly amount of £323.75.
The judgment was issued under Rule 21 and records only the redundancy payment outcome. The amount awarded was £9,388.75. The accompanying notice stated that if the sum is not paid within 14 days of the judgment being sent to the parties, interest may accrue under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 at the stipulated rate of 8% from 5 June 2020, but no separate interest sum was quantified in the judgment itself.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal found that the claimant, aged 59 at the effective date of termination on 31 August 2019, was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment calculated as 20 years at £323.75 gross weekly. | Upheld | — | £9,389 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £9,389
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.