Case 2401846/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Power v Jaguar Landrover Limited 20TH APRIL 2023 — 2023
- Case reference
- 2401846/2022
- Decision date
- 25 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sharkett Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Power
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that it did not have jurisdiction to hear the claimant’s allegation of discriminatory treatment in October 2014. It found the claim was presented outside the primary time limit and that the claimant had not shown reason for the tribunal to extend time on a just and equitable basis.
The judgment then records that the claimant withdrew the claims under ss.21-23 Equality Act 2010 for failure to make reasonable adjustments and under s.19 Equality Act 2010 for indirect discrimination on the protected characteristic of disability. Those claims were dismissed upon withdrawal.
The remaining claim or claims were listed to proceed to hearing on 19, 20 and 21 February 2024. No remedy was awarded in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Tribunal held it did not have jurisdiction to hear the alleged discriminatory treatment in October 2014 because the claim was presented outside the primary time limit and no basis was shown for a just and equitable extension. | Other | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Claim under ss.21-23 Equality Act 2010 for failure to make reasonable adjustments was dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Claim under s.19 Equality Act 2010 for indirect discrimination on the protected characteristic of disability was dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.