Case 2401859/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Dingle v Oliver Perry Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2401859/2022
- Decision date
- 24 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dunlop Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Dingle
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge Dunlop Date decided the case could be determined under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. On that basis, the tribunal dealt with the claimant's monetary claims and made findings from the papers before it.
The tribunal found that Oliver Perry Ltd had made an unauthorised deduction from Mr K Dingle's wages. It ordered the respondent to pay £701 gross, calculated as 136 hours at £9 per hour less £523 already paid in the final payment.
The tribunal also found that the claimant had been wrongfully dismissed and ordered payment of £378 gross in respect of unpaid notice, calculated as 42 hours at £9 per hour. The unfair dismissal claim was dismissed on withdrawal. The accompanying notice stated that interest under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 would apply if sums remained unpaid after the relevant decision day, which was 24 November 2022, with interest beginning on 25 November 2022 at 8% per annum.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £701.00, calculated as 136 hours at £9 per hour less £523 already paid in the final payment. | Upheld | — | £701 |
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was wrongfully dismissed and ordered payment of the gross sum of £378.00, representing 42 hours at £9 per hour in respect of unpaid notice. | Upheld | — | £378 |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal recorded that the unfair dismissal claim was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,079
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990, article 12
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.