Case 2401868/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Linnane v North West Maintenance Solutions Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2401868/2020
- Decision date
- 9 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Horne
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Linnane
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal entered judgment under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. It found that North West Maintenance Solutions Ltd had made an unauthorised deduction from Mr C Linnane's wages.
The respondent was ordered to pay £3,840.62, subject to such deductions as it was required to make for tax and national insurance. The judgment does not split that sum into separate heads of loss.
A separate notice explained the tribunal's interest provisions under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990. It recorded that interest would accrue if the sum was not paid within 14 days of the relevant decision day, with 9 July 2020 identified as the relevant decision day and 8% as the stipulated rate.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment was entered under Rule 21 and found that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages. | Upheld | — | £3,841 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,841
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 – Rule 21
- Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.