Case 2401883/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Scott v Lou Macari — 2023
- Case reference
- 2401883/2022
- Decision date
- 25 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Horne
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Scott
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal said the case raised a single complaint of unfair dismissal. It found that Mr S Scott had not been continuously employed for two years ending with the effective date of termination, so the general qualifying period in section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 prevented the claim unless an exception applied.
The tribunal considered the statutory exceptions in section 108 and found that none appeared to apply. It also recorded that section 18A(8) of the Employment Tribunals Act 1996 required an ACAS early conciliation certificate for relevant proceedings, including unfair dismissal claims, and that Mr Scott did not have such a certificate when he presented the claim.
Mr Scott had ticked a box stating that the respondent had already been in touch with ACAS, but the tribunal held that this was not enough to satisfy the exception in section 18A(8). It said he needed to show that the respondent had contacted ACAS and noted that he had not provided evidence of that despite being asked to do so.
After giving the claimant an opportunity by letter dated 25 March 2022 to explain why the claim should not be struck out, and receiving no reply, the tribunal struck out the claim under Rule 37 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal struck out the single unfair dismissal complaint. It found the claimant had not been continuously employed for two years ending with the effective date of termination, so section 108 ERA 1996 barred the claim, and that none of the statutory exceptions appeared to apply. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 108 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 18A(8) Employment Tribunals Act 1996
- Rule 37 Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.