Case 2401907/2019 · Employment Tribunal

Stephanie Pemberton v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs — 2019

Case reference: 2401907/2019
Decision date: 13 June 2019
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Hoey DATE

Indexed: 19 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Stephanie Pemberton

Respondent

The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal recorded that the claim against the second respondent was dismissed following the claimant's withdrawal of that claim, and that the second respondent was no longer a party to the proceedings. It also amended the respondent's name to The Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs.

The claimant's claims of direct disability discrimination and aiding contravention of the Equality Act 2010 were dismissed on withdrawal. The judgment did not determine the remaining claims, which were stated to proceed to the hearing fixed for 14-18 October 2019: failure to make reasonable adjustments, discrimination arising from disability and indirect disability discrimination.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Disability discrimination	The judgment states that the claimant's claim of direct disability discrimination was dismissed on withdrawal.	Withdrawn	Disability	—
Other	The judgment states that the claimant's claim of aiding contravention of the Equality Act 2010 was dismissed on withdrawal; the extracted text does not identify a separate protected characteristic for this claim.	Withdrawn	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.