Case 2401908/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K Perkins v Healthcare Resourcing Group Ltd PRELIMINARY HEARING — 2021
- Case reference
- 2401908/2019
- Decision date
- 12 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss K Perkins
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing on 8 February 2021 before Judge Brian Doyle sitting alone by video. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Ms S Deeley. The tribunal found that Miss K Perkins was a disabled person at all relevant times for the purposes of her disability discrimination claim.
The tribunal did not decide the merits of the underlying discrimination complaint at this stage. It directed that any question of time limitation would be determined at the final hearing after findings of fact, and it recorded that there was otherwise no present reason for a strike out order or a deposit order on the basis that the claim had little or no reasonable prospect of success. The claim was to proceed to the final hearing listed for 2 to 4 June 2021.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary hearing only. The tribunal found the claimant was a disabled person at all relevant times for the purposes of her disability discrimination claim, but did not determine the substantive discrimination claim. | Other | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.