Case 2401919/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C Byron v Michael Holden and 2 others — 2019
- Case reference
- 2401919/2019
- Decision date
- 31 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Horne REPRESENTATION
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Miss C Byron
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing in Liverpool on 3 December 2019 before Employment Judge Horne, the tribunal recorded that in late October or early November 2018 the claimant's employment transferred from Parkway Marketing Limited to Old Hall Consultancy Limited under regulation 4 of the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006.
The extracted judgment text gives reasons orally at the hearing and does not include any written reasons, monetary award, or further substantive findings beyond the TUPE transfer finding. It also records that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the judgment being sent to the parties.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transfer of undertakings (TUPE) | At a preliminary hearing, the tribunal found that the claimant's employment transferred from Parkway Marketing Limited to Old Hall Consultancy Limited in late October or early November 2018 under regulation 4 of the TUPE Regulations 2006. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- regulation 4 of the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 4 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.