Case 2401929/2024 · Employment Tribunal
K Sandland v RedWigWam Ltd (In Administration) — 2025
- Case reference
- 2401929/2024
- Decision date
- 31 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ross
Parties
2 namedClaimant
K Sandland
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 15 January 2025, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out for not being actively pursued. The claimant did not make representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
The tribunal therefore struck out the claim. No substantive issues were determined and no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal did not determine any substantive claim; it struck out the claim as not actively pursued after the claimant failed to make representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.