Case 2401938/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Z Herman v Federation of Jewish Services — 2020
- Case reference
- 2401938/2020
- Decision date
- 16 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ross Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Z Herman
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn the judgment dated 12 November 2020, Employment Judge Ross recorded that the claimant’s claims for payment in lieu of accrued but untaken holidays, notice pay, and redundancy pay had been paid by the respondent. With the claimant’s consent, those claims were dismissed on withdrawal.
The judgment also states that the claimant’s other claims were unaffected and would continue as part of a part-heard preliminary hearing on time limits listed for 14 January 2021 at Manchester Employment Tribunal. No substantive findings on the remaining claims were made in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The judgment records that the claimant’s claim for payment in lieu of accrued but untaken holidays had been paid by the respondent and was dismissed on withdrawal with the claimant’s consent. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment refers to a claim for notice pay; this is mapped to breach of contract as the closest taxonomy category. It was dismissed on withdrawal after the respondent had paid the sum claimed and the claimant consented. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Redundancy | The judgment records that the claimant’s redundancy pay claim had been paid by the respondent and was dismissed on withdrawal with the claimant’s consent. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.