Case 2401938/2025 · Employment Tribunal
P Chalmers v Chatloop Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 2401938/2025
- Decision date
- 10 September 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Batten
Parties
2 namedClaimant
P Chalmers
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued on 11 March 2025. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge determined that a decision could properly be made under rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 without a contested response.
The tribunal adjudged that Chatloop Ltd had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages for the period 1 to 28 February 2025. The complaint was therefore upheld as a wages deduction claim.
The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £3,958.33 gross wages. The judgment records that the claimant is responsible for any tax or National Insurance due on that sum.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Determined under rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages for 1-28 February 2025 and ordered payment of gross wages. | Upheld | — | £3,958 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,958
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.