Case 2401949/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Poole v Bomb Shelter Night Club — 2020
- Case reference
- 2401949/2020
- Decision date
- 13 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Batten
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Poole
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a short reasons judgment by Employment Judge Batten. The Tribunal had written to the claimant on 20 October 2020 and gave him an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out, because he had not responded to the Tribunal's letters of 3 June and 21 July 2020 and it appeared that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the Tribunal struck out the claim. No substantive merits finding was made and no compensation or other remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment does not restate the substantive basis of the claim; the case was listed on GOV.UK as unlawful deduction from wages. The Tribunal struck out the claim because the claimant did not respond to the Tribunal's letters of 3 June 2020 and 21 July 2020, had failed to make sufficient representations after a further letter dated 20 October 2020, and did not request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.