Case 2401994/2022 · Employment Tribunal
N Taylor v SHQ Holdings Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2401994/2022
- Decision date
- 9 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
N Taylor
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge therefore made a determination under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 on the material parts of the claim. The judgment records that the tribunal accepted the claimant’s claim for an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered the respondent to pay £5,000 gross.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £5,000. | Upheld | — | £5,000 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £1,250 in damages. | Upheld | — | £1,250 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of the gross sum of £3,750. | Upheld | — | £3,750 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,000
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.