Case 2402010/2022 · Employment Tribunal
D Powell Respondent Crosslane Property Group UK Limited v Crosslane Property Group UK Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 2402010/2022
- Decision date
- 15 May 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Batten REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
D Powell Respondent Crosslane Property Group UK Limited
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the video hearing on 7 May 2024, at which the respondent did not attend, Employment Judge Batten held that the complaint of unfair dismissal succeeded. The schedule attached to the judgment recorded a basic award of £2,448, loss of statutory rights of £500, loss of earnings to 15 March 2023 of £7,892.50, and a 25% uplift for breach of the ACAS Code of £1,973.13, with the total unfair dismissal award stated as £12,813.62. The recoupment section identified a prescribed element of £7,892.50 for the period 15 February 2023 to 15 March 2023 and an excess of £4,921.12.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of £12,187.49 gross. It made no order on the breach of contract complaint, and it ordered the respondent to pay £1,664.20 in legal costs because of the respondent's unreasonable conduct of the proceedings.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the complaint well-founded and awarded £12,813.62. The schedule itemised a basic award of £2,448, loss of statutory rights of £500, loss of earnings to 15 March 2023 of £7,892.50, and a 25% uplift for breach of the ACAS Code of £1,973.13; recoupment applied with a prescribed element of £7,892.50 and an excess of £4,921.12. | Upheld | — | £12,814 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of £12,187.49 gross. | Upheld | — | £12,187 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal stated that no order was made in respect of this complaint. | Other | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £12,814
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £2,448
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £10,366
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.