Case 2402012/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R. Mckenzie v Be Sure Group — 2022
- Case reference
- 2402012/2022
- Decision date
- 28 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R. Mckenzie
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr R. Mckenzie, brought a claim for unlawful deductions from wages against Be Sure Group Ltd. The respondent did not present a response within the time limit and did not appear at the hearing, which was heard by video on 8 June 2022 before Employment Judge Callan. The tribunal said it was satisfied that the claim could be determined on the basis of the claimant's documents, which included the conditional offer of employment, payslips for December 2021 and January 2022, the company's vehicle policy, personal equipment issue documents, and email exchanges between the parties from 1 February to 9 February 2022.
The tribunal upheld the unlawful deduction claim and ordered the respondent to pay £1,992.28 gross. It found that £451.90 gross was due for 5 days' accrued holiday pay in the period 18/10/2021 to 21/01/2022 and remained unpaid on termination of employment. It also found £1,265.38 gross was due as wages for the period 02/01/2022 to 31/01/2022.
A further £275 gross was found to have been unlawfully deducted from pay due on 31 December 2021. The written notice also stated that sums payable under the judgment would carry interest if not paid within 14 days after the decision was sent, with the relevant decision day recorded as 24 June 2022 and the stipulated rate of interest as 8%.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent had made unlawful deductions from wages. The award was made up of £451.90 gross for 5 days' accrued holiday pay for 18/10/2021 to 21/01/2022, £1,265.38 gross for wages due for 02/01/2022 to 31/01/2022, and £275 gross deducted from pay due on 31 December 2021. | Upheld | — | £1,992 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,992
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.