Case 2402013/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms K Wright v Communication Pubs Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2402013/2022
- Decision date
- 30 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Leach
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms K Wright
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent failed to present a valid response on time, so the Employment Judge determined the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. On that basis, the tribunal entered judgment without a contested hearing and listed hearing on 18 November 2022 was cancelled.
The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. It ordered Communication Pubs Ltd to pay Ms K Wright £4,800.00.
The judgment records the calculation as 282.4 statutory holiday hours accrued between 4 July 2020 and 6 October 2021, multiplied by the hourly rate of £17.00. The written notice also states that the relevant decision day was 30 August 2022, the calculation day was 31 August 2022, and the stipulated rate of interest was 8% per annum, but no separate interest amount was quantified in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £4,800, calculated as 282.4 statutory holiday hours accrued from 4 July 2020 to 6 October 2021 at £17 per hour. | Upheld | — | £4,800 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,800
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.