Case 2402020/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss J Dyson v Royal College of Nursing — 2020
- Case reference
- 2402020/2019
- Decision date
- 10 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dunlop Members
- Venue
- Manchester
- Panel members
- Mrs SA Humphreys, Mr W Haydock
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss J Dyson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal sat at Manchester before Employment Judge Dunlop with lay members Mrs SA Humphreys and Mr W Haydock. It heard the case on 25, 26, 27 and 28 November 2019, with Miss J Dyson appearing in person and Royal College of Nursing represented by counsel.
The judgment records that Miss Dyson's claim for constructive unfair dismissal under s94 Employment Rights Act 1996 failed and was dismissed. It also records that her claim for direct discrimination on the grounds of sex under s13 Equality Act 2010 failed and was dismissed.
No monetary award or other remedy is recorded in the judgment. The case was sent to the parties on 10 January 2020.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s94 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s13 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.