Case 2402034/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Nawaz v Lloyds pharmacy — 2022
- Case reference
- 2402034/2021
- Decision date
- 12 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Leach Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Nawaz
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dismissed the claimant's complaint of constructive unfair dismissal. It recorded that the complaint had been presented outside the time limit in section 111 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and found that it had been reasonably practicable for the complaint to have been presented in time.
The tribunal also dismissed the breach of contract complaint as out of time, referring to article 7 of the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction Order 1994 and again recording that it had been reasonably practicable for the complaint to have been presented in time.
The complaint of unauthorised deductions from pay did not proceed to determination on the merits. The judgment records that it was dismissed following the claimant's withdrawal.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The tribunal recorded that the constructive unfair dismissal complaint was presented outside the time limit in section 111 Employment Rights Act 1996 and that it was reasonably practicable for it to have been presented in time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal recorded that the breach of contract complaint was presented outside the time limit in article 7 of the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction Order 1994 and that it was reasonably practicable for it to have been presented in time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the unauthorised deductions from pay complaint was dismissed on the claimant's withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 111 Employment Rights Act 1996
- article 7 Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction Order 1994
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.