Case 2402042/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Nowak v Contract Joinery Upholstery Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2402042/2024
- Decision date
- 13 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Holmes
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Nowak
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which Employment Judge Holmes recorded that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. The tribunal therefore ordered Contract Joinery Upholstery Limited to pay Mr K Nowak £810.00 gross, with the claimant to account to HMRC for any tax and national insurance due on that sum.
The judgment also recorded that the hearing listed for 20 August 2024 was cancelled. No separate findings of fact or liability reasoning beyond the default judgment were set out in the extracted text.
The accompanying interest notice stated that the relevant decision day was 13 June 2024, the calculation day was 14 June 2024, and the stipulated rate of interest was 8% per annum if the award remained unpaid after 14 days. No separate quantified interest award was made in the judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Determined on the papers under Rule 21. The judgment ordered payment of £810.00 gross for unpaid holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £810 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £810
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.