Case 2402051/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K W Chan v Consolux M&E Consulting Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 2402051/2024
- Decision date
- 14 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ainscough Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K W Chan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 23 April 2024, the tribunal gave Mr K W Chan an opportunity to explain why his redundancy payment claim should not be struck out. The tribunal identified that the claim could not proceed because the claimant had insufficient service with Consolux M&E Consulting Ltd, so the tribunal did not have jurisdiction to hear it. Mr Chan did not make written representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, in response, and did not request a hearing.
The tribunal therefore struck out the redundancy payment claim. The judgment states that the claimant's other claims were not affected by this decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal struck out the redundancy payment claim after finding the claimant had insufficient service with the respondent to bring such a claim, so the tribunal did not have jurisdiction. The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, in response to the tribunal's letter dated 23 April 2024, and did not request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.