Case 2402095/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Lesley Jackson v Manfred Beattie as Chairman of, and on behalf of, the Members of Bradshaw Conservative Club — 2025
- Case reference
- 2402095/2024
- Decision date
- 13 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cline
- Panel members
- Mr S Carter, Ms S Howarth
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Lesley Jackson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought claims for unfair dismissal and wrongful dismissal against Manfred Beattie as Chairman of, and on behalf of, the Members of Bradshaw Conservative Club. The hearing took place at Manchester by video over 26 to 29 August 2025 and 13 October 2025 before Employment Judge Cline with two panel members.
The written judgment records that both the unfair dismissal and wrongful dismissal claims were not well-founded and were dismissed. The written record does not set out the tribunal's reasons, because reasons were given orally and written reasons would only be provided if requested.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The written judgment states that the unfair dismissal claim is not well-founded and is dismissed. Reasons were given orally and are not included in the written record. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The written judgment states that the wrongful dismissal claim is not well-founded and is dismissed. Reasons were given orally and are not included in the written record. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.