Case 2402096/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Breese v HSA Auto Group Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2402096/2023
- Decision date
- 20 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rhodes Representation
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Breese
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was heard at Manchester Employment Tribunal by CVP on 17 April 2023 before Employment Judge Rhodes. The respondent did not attend and no response had been entered. The written judgment records that Mr S Breese succeeded in his complaint of wrongful dismissal and in his complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages.
The tribunal ordered the respondent, HSA Auto Group Limited, to pay the claimant £1,634.60 gross in respect of wrongful dismissal and £2,082.73 gross in respect of unauthorised deductions from wages. No further findings of fact or reasons are set out in the written judgment, because reasons had been given orally at the hearing and written reasons were not provided.
The total of the awards recorded in the judgment is £3,717.33 gross. The separate interest notice explains the relevant decision day as 20 April 2023 and states that interest would be payable under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 if the sums remained unpaid after the 14-day period, but the judgment itself does not state any interest amount.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wrongful dismissal | Awarded gross at £1,634.60. | Upheld | — | £1,635 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Awarded gross at £2,082.73. | Upheld | — | £2,083 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,717
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.