Case 2402103/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Marissa Davidson v Cheshire Local Business Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 2402103/2025
- Decision date
- 23 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Feeney REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Marissa Davidson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal sat in Manchester before Employment Judge Feeney on 27 August 2025. The written record identifies the claimant as Marissa Davidson and the respondent as Cheshire Local Business Limited. The judgment records only the outcome of an application for interim relief; it does not set out separate findings on any underlying liability claim within the text provided.
The tribunal's decision was that the claimant's application for interim relief failed and was dismissed. The record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing, and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time. No monetary award was made or recorded in the written judgment.
Because the written decision is limited to the interim relief application and contains no further substantive reasons, no legal test is named in the text supplied and no split of remedy between different claims is given.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records only that the claimant's application for interim relief failed and was dismissed. No substantive underlying claim type is identified in the written record provided. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.