Case 2402105/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Smith & others (see attached schedule) v Bentley Harrington Limited (t/a Unilad) (in Administration) and 1 other — 2019
- Case reference
- 2402105/2019
- Decision date
- 21 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Parkin
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr A Smith & others (see attached schedule)
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the proceedings in case no. 2402105/2019 and the associated cases were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claims by the claimants. No substantive findings on liability, jurisdiction, or remedy are set out in the text provided.
The judgment identifies the respondents as Bentley Harrington Limited (t/a Unilad) (in Administration) and Unilad Group Limited, and it attaches a schedule of claimants and case numbers. It is signed by Regional Employment Judge Parkin and dated 4 October 2019, with the judgment sent to the parties on 21 November 2019.
Because the claims were withdrawn, there are no merits determinations and no monetary award recorded in the judgment. The extracted text does not identify any separate legal tests or issue-specific conclusions beyond the dismissal following withdrawal.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transfer of undertakings (TUPE) | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claims by the claimants. No substantive merits findings are given. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.