Case 2402106/2023 · Employment Tribunal
S MunuswamySanjaykumar v HB Pizza Ltd (In Voluntary Creditors Liquidation) — 2024
- Case reference
- 2402106/2023
- Decision date
- 1 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge KM Ross
Parties
2 namedClaimant
S MunuswamySanjaykumar
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal recorded that by letter dated 9 November 2023 it gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, as to why the claim should not be struck out. The stated reasons were that the claimant had not complied with the Order of Judge Aspinall dated 9 November 2023 and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, explaining why strike out should not be ordered, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge KM Ross struck out the claim. The judgment does not contain any substantive determination of the underlying claim on its merits and records no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working time regulations | The claim was struck out after the claimant failed to comply with the Order of Judge Aspinall dated 9 November 2023 and had not actively pursued the claim. The claimant did not make written representations, or sufficient representations, in response to the Tribunal's letter dated 9 November 2023, and did not request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.