Case 2402127/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms TJ Mattis v Kids 1st Steps Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 2402127/2024
- Decision date
- 10 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge KM Ross
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms TJ Mattis
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge KM Ross, sitting alone at Manchester (by CVP) on 8 January 2025, heard the claimant Ms TJ Mattis in person and the respondent Kids 1st Steps Ltd through its director Ms E Baxendale. The tribunal found the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages to be well-founded, on the basis that the respondent failed to pay the claimant her wages in the period of November 2023, and ordered payment of £1,708.76 representing one month's net wages.
The tribunal also found the complaint in respect of holiday pay to be well-founded, on the basis that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant for 8 days of holiday accrued but not taken as at the date her employment ended. The tribunal ordered payment of £800, calculated as 8 days at a £100 daily rate (gross).
The total sum of £2,508.76 was ordered to be paid by the respondent to the claimant within 14 days of the date of the judgment. Reasons were given orally at the hearing; no written reasons were provided in the document. A standard notice under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 was attached, indicating interest at 8% per annum would accrue from 11 January 2025 if the sum was not paid in full within 14 days of the decision being sent on 10 January 2025.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deduction from wages in November 2023; one month's net wages awarded. | Upheld | — | £1,709 |
| Holiday pay | Failure to pay for 8 days of accrued but untaken holiday on termination; calculated at 8 x £100 daily rate (gross). | Upheld | — | £800 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,509
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.