Case 2402157/2021 · Employment Tribunal

Ms T O'Connell v Street Property Limited — 2021

Case reference: 2402157/2021
Decision date: 11 May 2021
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Howard

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Ms T O'Connell

Respondent

Street Property Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The only complaint identified in the judgment was unfair dismissal. Employment Judge Howard recorded that, by letter dated 4 March 2021, the tribunal gave Ms T O'Connell an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out because it appeared to have no reasonable prospect of success, the stated reason being that the claimant did not have enough continuity of employment to bring an unfair dismissal claim.

The claimant did not make written representations and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the unfair dismissal complaint. No substantive merits findings were made on dismissal, and no monetary remedy was awarded.

The judgment was issued on 11 May 2021 and records the tribunal's decision dated 6 May 2021.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unfair dismissal	Struck out because the tribunal considered the claim had no reasonable prospect of success, on the basis that the claimant did not have enough continuity of employment to bring an unfair dismissal claim. The claimant did not make written representations or request a hearing in response to the strike-out warning letter dated 4 March 2021.	Struck out	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.