Case 2402161/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K McQuade v Air Factory Leisure Ltd & Others — 2019
- Case reference
- 2402161/2019
- Decision date
- 2 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Feeney JUDGMENT
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K McQuade
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dealt only with the respondent's response. By letter dated 19 June 2019, the tribunal gave the respondent an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing as to why the response should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued.
The respondent did not make written representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the response.
The judgment records that the respondent would remain entitled to notice of any hearings and decisions of the tribunal, but would only be entitled to participate in any hearing to the extent permitted by the Employment Judge. No finding is made on the substantive merits of the underlying claims in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Procedural judgment only: the respondent's response was struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The merits of the underlying claims are not determined in this text. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.