Case 2402168/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Afolabi-Brown v Evolve Facility Services Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2402168/2021
- Decision date
- 20 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Afolabi-Brown
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was an interlocutory hearing at Manchester by CVP before Employment Judge Phil Allen sitting alone on 17 January 2022. The respondent applied to strike out parts of the claimant's case on the basis that those parts had no reasonable prospect of success. The tribunal refused that application.
No substantive findings on the underlying race discrimination or unfair dismissal claims are recorded in the written judgment. The record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the sending of the written record.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | Interlocutory ruling only. The respondent's application to strike out parts of the claim on the grounds that they had no reasonable prospect of success was refused; no substantive finding on this claim is recorded in this judgment. | Other | Race | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Interlocutory ruling only. The respondent's application to strike out parts of the claim on the grounds that they had no reasonable prospect of success was refused; no substantive finding on this claim is recorded in this judgment. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.