Case 2402173/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms J Rooney v The Turner Home — 2022
- Case reference
- 2402173/2021
- Decision date
- 24 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shotter REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms J Rooney
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing to decide whether Ms Rooney’s disability discrimination complaints were in time. The tribunal recorded that the claimant was disabled for the purposes of section 6 of the Equality Act 2010, but found that the relevant statutory time limit had expired before early conciliation began on 13 January 2021. The claim form was received on 27 February 2021.
The tribunal accepted that the claimant had raised a number of different allegations over a long period, including complaints said to begin in 2015/2016 and others arising after her move into a painter/decorator role in 2018. It found her account of when the last discriminatory act occurred to be inconsistent, with different dates given at different stages, and held that her evidence on delay was confused and lacked a coherent explanation. It also found that some of the alleged events were too old to be fairly investigated by the respondent.
Applying the just and equitable discretion under section 123 Equality Act 2010, and referring to Robertson v Bexley Community Centre, British Coal Corporation v Keeble, Department of Constitutional Affairs v Jones, and Adedeji v University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Trust, the tribunal concluded that the balance of prejudice favoured the respondent. It noted fading memories, unavailable contemporaneous evidence, and the fact that key witnesses had left employment. It also found no arguable continuing act and said the claimant had not acted promptly once she says she became aware of time limits.
The tribunal therefore held that it did not have jurisdiction to consider the unlawful discrimination complaints and dismissed them. It also recorded that all money claims, including unfair dismissal, had already been withdrawn and dismissed in a separate judgment sent on 18 January 2022, leaving only the disability discrimination complaints for determination in this decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary hearing on limitation. The tribunal held the disability discrimination complaints were presented after the expiry of the s.123 Equality Act 2010 time limit and it was not just and equitable to extend time. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
8 references- s.123 Equality Act 2010
- just and equitable test
- Robertson v Bexley Community Centre
- British Coal Corporation v Keeble
- Department of Constitutional Affairs v Jones
- Adedeji v University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Trust
- Southwark London Borough v Afolosi
- Hutchinson v Westwood Television Ltd
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.