Case 2402180/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Paul Miles v Tzar Developments Ltd and 1 other — 2019
- Case reference
- 2402180/2019
- Decision date
- 11 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hoey Dated
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr Paul Miles
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the proceedings in case 2402180/2019 were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claims by the claimant, Mr Paul Miles. The judgment is a short one and does not set out findings of fact, liability analysis, or evidence on the underlying complaints.
Employment Judge Hoey signed the judgment on 15 November 2019 and it was sent to the parties on 11 December 2019. No remedy, legal test, or panel member is recorded in the judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claims. The short judgment does not separately describe the pleaded claims; this claim type is taken from the supplied listing category. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Redundancy | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claims. The short judgment does not separately describe the pleaded claims; this claim type is taken from the supplied listing category. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claims. The short judgment does not separately describe the pleaded claims; this claim type is taken from the supplied listing category. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claims. The short judgment does not separately describe the pleaded claims; this claim type is taken from the supplied listing category. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claims. The short judgment does not separately describe the pleaded claims; this claim type is taken from the supplied listing category. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.