Case 2402197/2019 · Employment Tribunal

Mr F Mac-Ennin v B P& S Limited — 2019

Case reference: 2402197/2019
Decision date: 28 October 2019
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Slater Date

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr F Mac-Ennin

Respondent

B P& S Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal found that the claimant’s unfair dismissal complaint succeeded. It ordered the respondent, B P & S Limited, to pay compensation of £16,459.79, and stated that this sum included an additional award of 25% of the compensatory award for failure to comply with the ACAS Code of Practice on Discipline and Grievance.

The judgment records that the Recoupment Regulations applied to the unfair dismissal award. It identified a prescribed element of £10,423.78 for the period 20 December 2018 to 23 October 2019, with the excess over that figure being £6,036.01. The judgment also states that the grand total of the award was £16,459.79.

The claimant’s breach of contract complaint also succeeded, but the tribunal made no separate damages award because the claimant had already been compensated for loss during the notice period as part of the unfair dismissal compensatory award.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unfair dismissal	The tribunal held that the unfair dismissal complaint succeeded and awarded compensation of £16,459.79, including an additional 25% award for failure to comply with the ACAS Code of Practice on Discipline and Grievance. The Recoupment Regulations were applied, with a prescribed element of £10,423.78 and an excess of £6,036.01.	Upheld	—	£16,460
Breach of contract	The breach of contract complaint succeeded, but no damages were awarded because the claimant had already been compensated for loss during the notice period within the unfair dismissal compensatory award.	Upheld	—	—

Remedy

Monetary award

Total award: £16,460; across all upheld claims
Compensatory award: £16,460; compensatory remedy recorded

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.