Case 2402200/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Parfitt v Intalekt Holdings (Nelson) Limited (in creditors voluntary liquidation) — 2020
- Case reference
- 2402200/2019
- Decision date
- 9 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Porter
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A Parfitt
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss A Parfitt brought claims against Intalekt Holdings (Nelson) Limited (in creditors voluntary liquidation). The case was heard at Manchester on 7 December 2020 before Employment Judge Porter sitting alone. The respondent did not attend.
The tribunal held that the claim of unfair dismissal was well-founded. It awarded £12,893 in total for unfair dismissal, made up of a basic award of £2,493 and a compensatory award of £10,400. The tribunal also recorded that the recoupment regulations do not apply.
The tribunal further found that the claim of indirect sex discrimination was well-founded and ordered the respondent to pay £20,000 for injury to feelings as claimed. In addition, it found that the respondent had made an unlawful deduction from wages by failing to pay wages from 25 September 2018 to the date of termination on 7 December 2018, and ordered payment of £1,662 gross for that six-week period. The total awards recorded in the judgment come to £34,555.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Claim found well-founded. Compensation comprised a basic award of £2,493 and a compensatory award of £10,400. The tribunal stated that the recoupment regulations do not apply. | Upheld | — | £12,893 |
| Sex discrimination | The tribunal found the claim of indirect sex discrimination well-founded and awarded £20,000 for injury to feelings as claimed. | Upheld | Sex | £20,000 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unlawful deduction from wages because wages were not paid from 25 September 2018 to the date of termination on 7 December 2018. The award was £1,662 gross for that six-week period. | Upheld | — | £1,662 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £34,555
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £2,493
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £10,400
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.