Case 2402209/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss D Rogers v Ashley Hunter Training Academy — 2019
- Case reference
- 2402209/2019
- Decision date
- 19 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ainscough
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss D Rogers
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the Manchester hearing on 24 July 2019, before Employment Judge Ainscough sitting alone, the claimant, Miss D Rogers, was represented by Ms M Kponou and the respondent, Ashley Hunter Training Academy, was represented by Ms V Schofield. The judgment records only one substantive disposition: the claimant's unfair dismissal claim was dismissed on withdrawal.
The tribunal did not record any findings on the merits of the dismissal claim, and no remedy was awarded. The note at the end of the judgment states that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time. The written record was sent to the parties on 19 August 2019.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the claimant's unfair dismissal claim was 'dismissed on withdrawal' at the hearing on 24 July 2019. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.