Case 2402213/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Goldstone v Charles Stanley & Co. Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2402213/2019
- Decision date
- 16 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Franey
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Goldstone
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dealt only with two complaints in this judgment. It recorded that the complaints of detriment in employment and automatic unfair dismissal on the ground of a protected disclosure, brought under sections 47B and 103A of the Employment Rights Act 1996, were dismissed following a withdrawal of those complaints by the claimant.
The judgment states that the other complaints brought by the claimant were not affected by this decision. No remedy findings were made in this judgment, and no monetary award was recorded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | Complaint of detriment in employment under sections 47B and 103A ERA 1996. The tribunal dismissed it following withdrawal by the claimant. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Automatic unfair dismissal complaint on the ground of a protected disclosure under sections 47B and 103A ERA 1996. The tribunal dismissed it following withdrawal by the claimant. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.