Case 2402219/2024 · Employment Tribunal
L Cheverton v Dantra Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 2402219/2024
- Decision date
- 24 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Butler
Parties
2 namedClaimant
L Cheverton
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting as Employment Judge Butler alone, determined that the claimant L Cheverton had been dismissed by Dantra Limited in breach of contract in respect of notice. The judgment was issued under Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The respondent was ordered to pay damages of £2,417.44, calculated on the basis of 29 hours per week at £10.42 per hour (giving £302.18 per week) over an 8-week notice period. The judgment does not record separate awards for basic, compensatory or injury to feelings components, and no aggravated remedy was made.
The accompanying notice under Article 12 of the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 sets the relevant decision day as 24 March 2025, the calculation day as 25 March 2025, and the stipulated rate of interest at 8% per annum; interest is payable only if the sum is not paid in full within 14 days of the decision being sent to the parties.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Breach of contract in respect of notice; damages calculated as 29 hours x £10.42 per hour = £302.18 per week, multiplied by 8 weeks' notice. | Upheld | — | £2,417 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,417
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.