Case 2402228/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Mercer and Ms P Rostron v Herbert T Forrest Ltd (in Administration) and Engie Regeneration Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2402228/2019
- Decision date
- 15 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Franey
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs V Mercer and Ms P Rostron withdrew their claims against Herbert T Forrest Ltd (in Administration) and Engie Regeneration Ltd. Employment Judge Franey therefore dismissed all proceedings against the first respondent, apart from the claims seeking a protective award, and dismissed the claims for notice pay, unlawful deduction from wages and protective award against the second respondent.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Notice pay claim dismissed against the second respondent following withdrawal of the claims by the claimants. The judgment does not classify this claim more specifically. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed against the second respondent following withdrawal of the claims by the claimants. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Transfer of undertakings (TUPE) | The judgment dismisses the claim seeking a protective award against the second respondent following withdrawal. It also records that claims remained live against the second respondent for failure to inform and consult about a relevant transfer, and that the protective award claim was not dismissed as against the first respondent in this judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.