Case 2402232/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr I Ferreira v Rateable Value Experts — 2024
- Case reference
- 2402232/2024
- Decision date
- 17 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Leach
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr I Ferreira
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 10 September 2024, the tribunal gave Mr I Ferreira an opportunity to make representations or to request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued. The judgment records that he did not make any written representations and did not request a hearing.
The tribunal therefore struck out the claim. No remedy was awarded and the judgment does not record any substantive determination on the merits of the underlying employment claims.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment does not list the substantive claims; this claim type is taken from the case listing context. The tribunal struck out the claim because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment does not list the substantive claims; this claim type is taken from the case listing context. The tribunal struck out the claim because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.