Case 2402278/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr I Anwar v General All Purpose Plastics Ltd. — 2024
- Case reference
- 2402278/2023
- Decision date
- 29 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sharkett REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr I Anwar
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary issue hearing on 15 May 2024 before Employment Judge Sharkett, heard by CVP in Manchester. The tribunal dealt with the claimant's victimisation claims under section 27 of the Equality Act 2010, identified in paragraphs 7.2.1 and 7.2.2 of the Case Management Order dated 16 May 2023.
The tribunal struck out those victimisation claims under Rule 37(c) of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure. No merits findings were made on the remaining claims at this stage.
The judgment records that the claimant's remaining claims will be determined at the final hearing commencing on 18 November 2024. It also states that reasons were given orally and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Victimisation | Victimisation claim set out at paragraph 7.2.1 of the Case Management Order of 16 May 2023; struck out under Rule 37(c). | Struck out | — | — |
| Victimisation | Victimisation claim set out at paragraph 7.2.2 of the Case Management Order of 16 May 2023; struck out under Rule 37(c). | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s27 Equality Act 2010
- Rule 37(c) of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.