Case 2402282/2023 · Employment Tribunal
A Ward v Octopus Umbrella Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2402282/2023
- Decision date
- 1 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Leach
Parties
2 namedClaimant
A Ward
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in favour of the claimant, Miss A Ward. The tribunal found that Octopus Umbrella Limited had made unauthorised deductions from her wages by failing to pay her wages for the period 1 September to 28 November 2022.
The judgment records that the claimant's wages were £2,083.33 per month. On that basis, the tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £6,089.70 gross. No other substantive claim outcome or separate remedy head is recorded in the judgment text provided.
The judgment also includes the standard interest notice, stating the relevant decision day was 1 June 2023, the calculation day was 2 June 2023, and the stipulated rate of interest was 8% per annum. No interest figure is stated in the decision itself.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal found the respondent had made unauthorised deductions by failing to pay wages for 1 September to 28 November 2022. The claimant's wages were recorded as £2,083.33 per month. | Upheld | — | £6,090 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,090
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.