Case 2402290/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss H Craigie v Cheshire Independent Living Services — 2020
- Case reference
- 2402290/2020
- Decision date
- 23 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shotter JUDGMENT
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss H Craigie
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Shotter, sitting alone at Liverpool on 28 October 2020, struck out Miss H Craigie's unlawful deduction of wages claim against Cheshire Independent Living Services. The tribunal had issued a strike out warning on 3 September 2020 and gave the claimant until 17 September 2020 to make representations, or request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out.
The tribunal found that the claimant did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. It struck out the claim on the basis that the claimant had failed to comply with the tribunal's orders of 5 June, 18 July and 19 August 2020, had not complied with the strike out warning, and had not actively pursued the claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Struck out following a strike out warning dated 3 September 2020. The tribunal referred to the claimant's failure to comply with orders dated 5 June, 18 July and 19 August 2020, and to the claim not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.